Epstein list.
Joined:
X days ago
# Posts:
X,XXX
Contributor Points:
X
Replies:
So it was a 427-1 vote! Who voted against it, and did some vote present? There's 435 members, only 428 voted. Definitely a lot more GOP voted for it than I thought they would. My opinion and mine alone and no one else.
RambleOn and AverageSue reacted skutfarcus : All of them that disagree with him.
The name of a very, very high ranking executive at Goldman Sachs will be on the Epstein list

So,..... when are the Epstein Files coming out for public observation? 🤔
AverageSue and skutfarcus reacted
@CCubs :
I have to first apologize for my inserted link - as I have no idea as the credibility or veracity of the publication nor the journalist reporting - only that the same terms were used that evoked my response. I have seen judges say "could release", "should release", "ought to release", "deserve to the release" - but none have said "Must Release" - this is the purpose of the judiciary. When our congress is in conflict with our executive branch - their word is the decision that breaks the tie. It is the essence of the check and balance directive of a three branch division. Yet, when they do not use compelling language - namely for fear of or reinforcement to the conflict - it mires the credibility of all three branches of government and reinforces the lack of trust we continuously feel. At this point, if they haven't gotten the names out that they wanted out (and they're lying to say they haven't done that to some degree), then either it is impossible to vindicate or exclude the desired names - they just can't. We are to believe that what if anything is released by Christmas that it will have benefit of being reliable or truthful, or that it even may compel any accountability for the named perpetrators. www.kezi.com/news/na tional/what-to-know- about-the-justice-de partments-jeffr
DennisinPeoria and AverageSue reacted I have to first apologize for my inserted link - as I have no idea as the credibility or veracity of the publication nor the journalist reporting - only that the same terms were used that evoked my response.
Any minute now new photos of famous and high profile people with Epstein are going to be released.
skutfarcus and AverageSue reacted Any minute now new photos of famous and high profile people with Epstein are going to be released.
billybob : And yet NOTHING will be done to reprimand or further investigate the guilty parties.
There are 95,000 photos the estate released, Obviously, they can't be released all at once,
CCubs : There are 95,000 photos the estate released, Obviously, they can't be released all at once,
OBVIOUSLY, they should be going after the guilty parties.
** Would you be interested in keeping up to date with news & events going on in the Peoria area? Consider supporting an alternative social media platform for Peoria by creating an account today! (it's fast, easy, privacy focused, and free!)
Views: 18,371
# Replies: 879




