Close

Epstein list.

Epstein list.
Go to top of page
12
...
678
...
7879»
FASTLANE: This "Fastlane" discussion may cover sensitive, inflammatory, or controversial topics. See Fastlane guidelines »
Replies:
Message Menu
skutfarcus Top Forum Contributor14.7 yrs
~ 1 year, 2 mos ago   Jul 16, '25 4:01pm  
He attacked his own supporters today for wanting answers.
Message Menu
CCubs Online Top Forum Contributor7.4 yrs
~ 1 year, 2 mos ago   Jul 16, '25 5:13pm  
He attacked his own supporters today for wanting answers.
 
skutfarcus :
It is beyond real.
It is beyond ridiculous.
It is beyond belief.
It is beyond insanity.
It is Trump's imaginary world.
Message Menu
DennisinPeoria Top Forum Contributor14.9 yrs
~ 1 year, 2 mos ago   Jul 16, '25 9:28pm  
What's ironic or hypocritical is Speaker Mike Johnson believes the list should be released. But when Democrats submitted a resolution or amendment to require the release, guess what happened? Every House GOP voted against it. Figure that one out folks.
 
And then I saw a piece about Dershowitz, who, when interviewed, said no current office holders were on the list. And that 2 NY judges were suppressing the release, not DJT'S administration. On top of that, Dershowitz claims there really is no "list", just redacted affidavits from Epstein accusers.
thehill.com/homenews /administration/5401 288-dershowitz-judge s-suppressing-e
 
So that brings an interesting question: can this list be unredacted, and released without disclosing the names of the victims?
My opinion and mine alone and not my employer's.
Message Menu
CCubs Online Top Forum Contributor7.4 yrs
~ 1 year, 2 mos ago   Jul 17, '25 10:35am  
skutfarcus wants the Epstein Files released.
PeoriaChronicle does not want the Epstein Files released.
BIG DIFFERENCE!
Message Menu
CCubs Online Top Forum Contributor7.4 yrs
~ 1 year, 2 mos ago   Jul 17, '25 10:57am  
I don't believe you, I think you are lying.
Message Menu
billybob Top Forum Contributor15.2 yrs
~ 1 year, 2 mos ago   Jul 17, '25 11:13am  
What's ironic or hypocritical is Speaker Mike Johnson believes the list should be released. But when Democrats submitted a resolution or amendment to require the release, guess what happened? Every House GOP voted against it. Figure that one out folks. And then I saw a piece about Dershowitz, who, when interviewed, said no current office holders were on the list. And that 2 NY judges were suppressing the release, not DJT'S administration. On top of that, Dershowitz claims there really is no "list", just redacted affidavits from Epstein accusers. thehill.com/homenews /administration/5401 288-dershowitz-judge s-suppressing-e So that brings an interesting question: can this list be unredacted, and released without disclosing the names of the victims? My opinion and mine alone and not my employer's.
 
DennisinPeoria :
Possibly,
Message Menu
CCubs Online Top Forum Contributor7.4 yrs
~ 1 year, 2 mos ago   Jul 17, '25 1:06pm  
DennisinPeoria : Possibly,
 
billybob : Possibly, sooner rather than later.
Message Menu
bn13814 19.1 yrs
~ 1 year, 2 mos ago   Jul 17, '25 1:09pm  
I don't believe you, I think you are lying.
 
CCubs : Your obsession makes no sense.
Post a comment »

FASTLANE: This "Fastlane" discussion may cover sensitive, inflammatory, or controversial topics. See Fastlane guidelines »
« Back to Chat
Views: 26,639
# Replies: 1,178